January 12th, 2009
Ben Nevis & Ors v Inland Revenue
“A majority of the Supreme Court, Tipping, McGrath and Gault JJ, has decided that, although the claimed deductions complied with the ordinary specific provisions in income tax legislation under which they were claimed, the Trinity scheme involved tax avoidance arrangements which were void under the legislation”
“The Court has also upheld penalties imposed on the appellants under the Tax Administration Act 1994 for taking an abusive tax position in claiming the deductions”
This is an appeal from the trinity cases that hit the headlines here over the last few years.
Tourism operator wins seven-year fight with IRD A tourism operator has won a case against Inland Revenue to have $6.28 million in goods and service tax paid back after a seven-year fight over a cheque that bounced.
“At the time Inland Revenue said it would investigate the case but during the investigation an automatic computer-generated statement and cheque was sent out to the company accidentally paying out the amount owed. The IRD then put a stop on the cheque, causing it to bounce”
The IRD then retrospectively changed the law and claimed that the taxpayer wasn’t entitled to the refund. However the court has said that the taxpayer was entitled to the refund.
Glenharrow Holdings Ltd v Inland Revenue
Previously The Court of Appeal had dismissed Glenharrow’s appeal and reduced Glenharrows refund.
The Supreme Court has confirmed that ruling, agreeing that the Commissioner was entitled to invoke s 76 of the GST Act 1985 and to treat the arrangement as a tax avoidance. The Court has found that the arrangement entered into to defeat the intent and application of the Act: the price was not paid in economic terms, even though as between the parties a debt was discharged. The structure adopted by the parties achieved no economic effect and nothing significant in commercial terms.
Bookmark to:
Posted in Tax News Brief | 1 Comment »
January 11th, 2009
Another interesting Herald editorial is out suggesting that there should be some kind of tax releif on interest.
The editorial is written by a guy called Jean Albert who is a “specialist in international law and a consultant on taxation, trade and competition.
The taxation of interest on savings is unfair because it punishes people who save money by limiting or reducing their future purchasing power.
This form of taxation is generally perceived as unjust because it decreases the value of money which has already been taxed once at source.
I’m not sure what Mr Albert is suggesting as an alternative? One other alternative is to tax interest at a flat rate (say 10%) to encourage savings. However this also creates distortions in the market as people will now invest in bonds only for tax reasons and there is a fuzzy line between what is interest and what are shares.
Bookmark to:
Posted in Tax Policy | No Comments »
January 9th, 2009
Business is calling for a raft of tax changes to alleviate its cash flow problems.
Mark Shaw tax partner at Deloitte says “Companies currently pay provisional tax on their last year’s profit – plus an assumed 5 per cent annual increase – should be scrapped or replaced, with an assumption of a 10 per cent decrease”
“Given the current economic climate, one would expect profits will decrease sharply”
This isn’t a very well thought out idea, as it assumes that all businesses will have a decrease in profits. However some businesses are doing well despite the economic conditions.
Furthermore there are provisions in the current system which require you to revise your profit estimates and make payments accordingly.
This seems to me to be a knee jerk reaction.
(I put the question mark above because it seems like a couple of people want an overhaul and the article claimes that these people are representative of all NZ business)
Bookmark to:
Posted in Tax Policy | No Comments »
January 9th, 2009
The NZ Herald editorial is claiming that capital gains tax is viable and perfect for the financial climate
Some quotes from the opinion:
“If a capital gains tax were introduced, it should allow other tax rates to be cut, while maintaining the same overall revenue stream. One option, a rollback in GST, would benefit low-income families, making them less reliant on government support.”
“Rather than being something that is cursorily discarded, the idea of introducing a capital gains tax needs to be seriously looked at with the aim of achieving a fairer, simpler and more efficient overall tax system”
Tax experts in NZ have for a long time argued for a CGT, but the general public is against the idea. Introducing a CGT in NZ is political suicide and I can’t see Mr. Key having fought this hard to be the prime minister wanting to lose his position because he tried to introduce a CGT.
Bookmark to:
Posted in Capital Gains Tax, Tax Policy | No Comments »
December 18th, 2008
Following our post the other day about Michael Hill moving to Australia to dodge tax comes this article in the Herald where the IRD are saying that the Tax system is under pressure from rich avoiding tax.
There are some interesting lines from the article:
“There is ample evidence that people are using different entities to structure their affairs in ways which reduce their tax liabilities.”
This to me is common sense. If you can minimise your tax by legal means then you would be a fool not to. We’ve had that discussion many times before on this blog. It’s also interesting to note that the IRD were not saying in the above quote that they were concerned that taxpayers were using illegal means to minimise their tax, simply that they were minimising their tax.
The report goes on to say:
“It can create a mentality that rather than tax being something which is paid for by all, tax is something for the smart, the able and the well advised to avoid. Over time, this can erode confidence that the tax system is fair.”
This has long been a view held by all salary and wage earners (that self employed people get a better deal). However many a salaried person chases their dream of owning their own business only to have it shattered upon the rocks of IRD compliance and red tape.
You could sum up the IRD’s view by saying that he who has the best advisors wins. Well put I say.
Bookmark to:
Posted in Tax General | 1 Comment »
December 18th, 2008
The Govenor of New York has today proposed an “ipod Tax”
The ipod tax would tax the sale of downloaded music and other “digitally delivered entertainment services” by 4 per cent.
The article goes on to say that:
There also would be higher taxes on gas, taxi rides, cable and satellite TV service, cigars, beer, movie and sports tickets, and health spa visits, to name a few items.
Paterson seems to be fighting both obesity and budget deficits with a proposal for an 18 per cent tax on soda and other sugary drinks containing less than 70 per cent real fruit juice.
An ipod tax… That’s something to think about.

Bookmark to:
Posted in Absurd Taxes | No Comments »
December 16th, 2008
Posted in Australia, Tax Avoidance | No Comments »
November 8th, 2006
Wesley Snipes has reached a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service regarding his tax fraud charges.
The agreement will likely see Snipes surrender to federal authorities when he next returns to America.
In return for agreeing to a payment plan, Snipes will not be jailed and will be allowed both to continue working and to travel abroad.
According to an October 17 indictment, Snipes tried to unsuccessfully claim nearly $12 million in false refunds for taxes he paid in 1996 and 1997.
The “Blade” star had his taxes prepared by accountants with a history of filing false returns to reap payments for their clients.
Snipes is currently in Namibia shooting the horror film “Gallowwalker.”
Bookmark to:
Posted in Tax Evasion/Fraud | 4 Comments »
November 8th, 2006
Posted in IRD, Kiwisaver | 1 Comment »
November 8th, 2006
Posted in International, Tax Rate | No Comments »