Archive for June, 2006

Awatere Huata tax case adjourned

Friday, June 30th, 2006

A case against former MP Donna Awatere Huata of failing to file tax returns was adjourned at Hastings District Court today.

Awatere Huata is accused of failing to file tax returns for the financial years ending in 2003, 2004, and 2005.

The case was adjourned until July 27.

Bookmark to:
Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to Del.icio.us Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to digg Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to FURL Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to blinklist Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to My-Tuts Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to reddit Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to Technorati Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Awatere Huata tax case adjourned' to Newsvine 

IRD apologises for tax summary blunder

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006

The Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has apologised for wrongly sending out about 3500 letters regarding tax summaries.

The department sent the letters out telling recipients there were errors in their summaries for the 2005/2006 year.

One woman told the Southland Times she had already received her personal tax summary for the year, along with a refund, before receiving a letter saying the summary was wrong and another would be sent.

The problem was picked up when it was discovered the IRD number on the second letter was not hers, despite it containing the correct name and address.

Bookmark to:
Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to Del.icio.us Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to digg Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to FURL Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to blinklist Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to My-Tuts Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to reddit Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to Feed Me Links! Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to Technorati Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to Yahoo My Web Add 'IRD apologises for tax summary blunder' to Newsvine 

IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006

A discussion document released today proposes codifying the tax rules on general partnerships and introducing new rules on limited partnerships. The proposed changes are intended to complement the planned introduction of modern regulatory rules for limited partnerships. Submissions close on 11 August. For more information see the government’s media statement and the discussion document, “General and limited partnerships – proposed tax changes”.

Bookmark to:
Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to Del.icio.us Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to digg Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to FURL Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to blinklist Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to My-Tuts Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to reddit Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to Feed Me Links! Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to Technorati Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to Yahoo My Web Add 'IRD Releases Partnership Discussion Document' to Newsvine 

Spain, Poland DTA progress

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

New Zealand’s double tax agreement with Spain passed through its final legislative stages today and is expected to come into force in late July, while the new DTA with Poland awaits only Polish legislation.

Bookmark to:
Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to Del.icio.us Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to digg Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to FURL Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to blinklist Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to My-Tuts Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to reddit Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to Technorati Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Spain, Poland DTA progress' to Newsvine 

Apology to Mr Rob Earle

Saturday, June 24th, 2006

TaxBlog would like to sincerely apologise to Mr Rob Earle for conclusions made in a previous post on this blog which were not true. Tax Blog made several assumptions based on what was reported in the media and Mr Earle has contacted this blog and set the record straight.

These conclusions were unfair to Mr. Earle and his company IGS.

Bookmark to:
Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to Del.icio.us Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to digg Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to FURL Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to blinklist Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to My-Tuts Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to reddit Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to Technorati Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Apology to Mr Rob Earle' to Newsvine 

MP has bad Experience with IRD

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

Mr Foss drew attention to Inland Revenue’s claim that it had improved response rates to customer queries. He said his experience was very different.

“I have spent – and my wife has spent – hours on the phone trying to get through on various numbers to IRD,” Mr Foss said at the meeting.

“I am bringing up a personal case here, because thousands of Kiwis are having the same problem. How on Earth am I able to get through to your operational staff to discuss an issue?”2 per pay day per employee.

Bookmark to:
Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to Del.icio.us Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to digg Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to FURL Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to blinklist Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to My-Tuts Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to reddit Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to Feed Me Links! Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to Technorati Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to Yahoo My Web Add 'MP has bad Experience with IRD' to Newsvine 

IRD set payroll subsidy

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

The government’s new payroll subsidy to encourage small businesses to make use of the services of payroll agents has been set by Order in Council at $2 per pay day per employee.

Bookmark to:
Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to Del.icio.us Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to digg Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to FURL Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to blinklist Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to My-Tuts Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to reddit Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to Feed Me Links! Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to Technorati Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to Yahoo My Web Add 'IRD set payroll subsidy' to Newsvine 

Payroll Subsidy Set

Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

The government’s new payroll subsidy to encourage small businesses to make use of the services of payroll agents has been set by Order in Council at $2 per pay day per employee.

Bookmark to:
Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to Del.icio.us Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to digg Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to FURL Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to blinklist Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to My-Tuts Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to reddit Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to Technorati Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Payroll Subsidy Set' to Newsvine 

Non-compliance and the tax gap

Wednesday, June 21st, 2006

Roth CPA has some interesting observations from the IRS convention in the States:

Mark Matthews, IRS deputy commissioner for services and enforecment, had a sharp observation on efforts to close the “tax gap,” the difference between the amount of taxes imposed in theory and the amount collected:

Matthews acknowledged that the IRS will also have to get better at using the data it already has, but said that with significant help on the funding side and some legislative improvements, $50 billion to $100 billion could be shaved from the $345 billion tax gap.

“We’ll never get it to zero. We’ll never get close to zero,” he said. “You wouldn’t want to live in a country where it was close to zero”.

A study released later in the day by three researchers, among them the IRS’s Edward Emblom, asserted in its preliminary results that increased audits can have a significant effect on compliance for all taxpayers.

According to the study, doubling the audit rate from 1 percent to 2 percent on businesses with incomes between $25,000 and $100,000 reduces noncompliance by 7 percent, while doubling the audit rate for larger businesses had similar but less pronounced results.

Bookmark to:
Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to Del.icio.us Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to digg Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to FURL Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to blinklist Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to My-Tuts Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to reddit Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to Technorati Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Non-compliance and the tax gap' to Newsvine 

Good Quote

Wednesday, June 21st, 2006

Quote from the tax foundation:

What is the difference between a direct subsidy on the spending side to a company that is poor spending policy and an equal tax deduction that is poor tax policy? Nothing, except that going through the tax code is often less transparent, and therefore easier for tax lobbyists to get inserted into law.

A good point!

Bookmark to:
Add 'Good Quote' to Del.icio.us Add 'Good Quote' to digg Add 'Good Quote' to FURL Add 'Good Quote' to blinklist Add 'Good Quote' to My-Tuts Add 'Good Quote' to reddit Add 'Good Quote' to Feed Me Links! Add 'Good Quote' to Technorati Add 'Good Quote' to Yahoo My Web Add 'Good Quote' to Newsvine